Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i3-10100
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0653
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
22.74k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
20.31k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
4.71k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
7.65k (x1.22)
TOTAL
38.61k
55.41k (x1.44)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
71.95k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
67.7k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
16.43k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
6.25k (x0.73)
TOTAL
311.57k
162.33k (x0.52)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4