| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 141.3 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
506e3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2019
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
2.36k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
9.79k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.08k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
3.36k (x0.57)
TOTAL
21.13k
18.59k (x0.88)

Multithread

Silver 4208

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
4.45k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
18.16k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
5.48k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
3.5k (x0.41)
TOTAL
141.3k
31.59k (x0.22)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
952 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
362 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1662 points/W
903 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
809 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
983 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6604 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4