| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.5 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
860f01
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
469.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
16.95k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
26.26k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
9.4k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
8.38k (x1.33)
TOTAL
38.61k
60.99k (x1.58)

Multithread

Silver 4208

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
159.87k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
215.44k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
88.45k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.9k (x0.69)
TOTAL
311.57k
469.67k (x1.51)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4