| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs A9 9420


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 6.7 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
670f00
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
46.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
2.56k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
9.97k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.96k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
2.12k (x0.36)
TOTAL
21.13k
17.61k (x0.83)

Multithread

Silver 4208

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
3.88k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
9.26k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
3.9k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
1.74k (x0.2)
TOTAL
141.3k
18.79k (x0.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
11.74k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
16.05k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.26k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.05k (x0.33)
TOTAL
38.61k
33.09k (x0.86)

Multithread

Silver 4208

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
18.57k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
20.11k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
5.27k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
2.38k (x0.28)
TOTAL
311.57k
46.33k (x0.15)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
3089 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4