| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-11300H


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
25.83k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
23.56k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
9.2k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
5.06k (x0.8)
TOTAL
38.61k
63.64k (x1.65)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
116.87k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
121.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
41.8k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
6k (x0.7)
TOTAL
311.57k
285.75k (x0.92)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4