Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-9700F
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
906ed
Core
Skylake-SP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
269.85k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.67k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
17.16k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.7k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
14.37k (x2.2)
TOTAL
25.46k
41.9k (x1.65)
Multithread
4110
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
26.31k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
97.53k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
31.53k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
8.94k (x0.92)
TOTAL
156.83k
164.31k (x1.05)
Performance/W
4110
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
240 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1127 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
363 points/W
485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
138 points/W
TOTAL
1845 points/W
2528 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4095 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2182 points/GHz
3057 points/GHz
TOTAL
8487 points/GHz
8915 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4