Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-8086K
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
906ea
Core
Skylake-SP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
352.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
28.74k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
25.31k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.78k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
13.12k (x1.93)
TOTAL
45.82k
72.95k (x1.59)
Multithread
4110
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
160.53k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
147.29k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
35.65k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
8.92k (x0.94)
TOTAL
281.48k
352.4k (x1.25)
Performance/W
4110
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
3709 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4