| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0652
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.69k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
18.71k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.84k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
13.95k (x2.13)
TOTAL
25.46k
43.19k (x1.7)

Multithread

4110

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
18.79k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
86.1k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
27.42k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
5.27k (x0.54)
TOTAL
156.83k
137.58k (x0.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
29.06k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
26.49k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
6.23k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
13.89k (x2.04)
TOTAL
45.82k
75.67k (x1.65)

Multithread

4110

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
154.61k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
151.34k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
36.33k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
6.93k (x0.73)
TOTAL
281.48k
349.21k (x1.24)

Performance/W
4110
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4