| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-9300H


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
906ea
Core
Skylake-SP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.38k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
12.84k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
4.6k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
6.23k (x0.95)
TOTAL
25.46k
27.05k (x1.06)

Multithread

4110

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
11.6k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
48.01k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
17.05k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
3.88k (x0.4)
TOTAL
156.83k
80.54k (x0.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
26.62k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.38k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.52k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
12.05k (x1.77)
TOTAL
45.82k
67.57k (x1.47)

Multithread

4110

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
107.95k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
104.02k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
24.4k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
7.74k (x0.82)
TOTAL
281.48k
244.1k (x0.87)

Performance/W
4110
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4