Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-8300H
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
906ea
Core
Skylake-SP
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
23.6k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
21.72k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.61k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
6.8k (x1)
TOTAL
45.82k
56.72k (x1.24)
Multithread
4110
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
79.12k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
81.27k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
17.46k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.62k (x0.49)
TOTAL
281.48k
182.47k (x0.65)
Performance/W
4110
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4