| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-4690


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
306c3
Core
Skylake-SP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
163.95k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
22.97k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
13.02k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.21k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
4.74k (x0.7)
TOTAL
45.82k
45.95k (x1)

Multithread

4110

i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
85.98k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
49.01k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
19.5k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
9.46k (x1)
TOTAL
281.48k
163.95k (x0.58)

Performance/W
4110
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
1952 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4