| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0653
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.87k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
15.79k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.1k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
12.13k (x1.85)
TOTAL
25.46k
36.89k (x1.45)

Multithread

4110

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
22.17k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
101.79k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
34.13k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
3.74k (x0.39)
TOTAL
156.83k
161.83k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
25.16k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
22.28k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.18k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.97k (x1.76)
TOTAL
45.82k
64.6k (x1.41)

Multithread

4110

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
144.86k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
120.98k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
32.55k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
3.73k (x0.39)
TOTAL
281.48k
302.13k (x1.07)

Performance/W
4110
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4