| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0653
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
14.19k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
4.62k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
11.03k (x1.69)
TOTAL
25.46k
33.84k (x1.33)

Multithread

4110

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
22.77k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
96.59k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
31.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
2.45k (x0.25)
TOTAL
156.83k
153.46k (x0.98)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
22k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
19.98k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.57k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.31k (x1.66)
TOTAL
45.82k
57.85k (x1.26)

Multithread

4110

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
136.69k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
135.25k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
32.76k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
2.48k (x0.26)
TOTAL
281.48k
307.18k (x1.09)

Performance/W
4110
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4