Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-1038NG7
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
706e5
Core
Skylake-SP
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
23.2k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
21.2k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.4k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.54k (x1.7)
TOTAL
45.82k
65.35k (x1.43)
Multithread
4110
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
94.68k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
103.38k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
35.79k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
9.33k (x0.98)
TOTAL
281.48k
243.18k (x0.86)
Performance/W
4110
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4