Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-8145U
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
806eb
Core
Skylake-SP
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
17.78k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
12.8k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.61k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
1.3k (x0.19)
TOTAL
45.82k
34.48k (x0.75)
Multithread
4110
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
28.06k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
34.83k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
9.69k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
2.55k (x0.27)
TOTAL
281.48k
75.13k (x0.27)
Performance/W
4110
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4