| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-8130U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.2 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806ea
Core
Skylake-SP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
21.09k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
19.41k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.05k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
2.8k (x0.41)
TOTAL
45.82k
47.35k (x1.03)

Multithread

4110

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
38.23k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
38.89k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
8.75k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
2.47k (x0.26)
TOTAL
281.48k
88.35k (x0.31)

Performance/W
4110
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4