| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-10105


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0653
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.5k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
18.39k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.78k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
8.3k (x1.27)
TOTAL
25.46k
36.97k (x1.45)

Multithread

4110

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
16.13k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
75.62k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
27.88k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
3.57k (x0.37)
TOTAL
156.83k
123.2k (x0.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
28.9k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
25.85k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.88k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
8.29k (x1.22)
TOTAL
45.82k
68.92k (x1.5)

Multithread

4110

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
111.69k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
110.23k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
28.45k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
3.56k (x0.38)
TOTAL
281.48k
253.93k (x0.9)

Performance/W
4110
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4