| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.6 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
860f01
Core
Skylake-SP
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
16.59k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.51k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.38k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
7.98k (x1.17)
TOTAL
45.82k
57.47k (x1.25)

Multithread

4110

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
152.43k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
195.79k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
83.2k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
5.38k (x0.57)
TOTAL
281.48k
436.8k (x1.55)

Performance/W
4110
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4