| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a20f10
Core
Skylake-SP
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
23.28k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
25.58k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.72k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
25.45k (x3.74)
TOTAL
45.82k
86.03k (x1.88)

Multithread

4110

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
135.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
180.56k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
80.27k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
38.94k (x4.11)
TOTAL
281.48k
435.05k (x1.55)

Performance/W
4110
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4