| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 5 5500U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
860f81
Core
Skylake-SP
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
261.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
15.63k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
8.62k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
6.51k (x0.96)
TOTAL
45.82k
53.76k (x1.17)

Multithread

4110

5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
90.38k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
118.74k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
48.39k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.4k (x0.46)
TOTAL
281.48k
261.91k (x0.93)

Performance/W
4110
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
17461 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4