| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
800f82
Core
Skylake-SP
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.41k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
15.96k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
4.69k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
17.42k (x2.66)
TOTAL
25.46k
41.47k (x1.63)

Multithread

4110

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
20.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
110.37k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
39.25k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
6.66k (x0.69)
TOTAL
156.83k
177.16k (x1.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
13.76k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.03k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.12k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.23k (x2.24)
TOTAL
45.82k
57.13k (x1.25)

Multithread

4110

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
83.23k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
161.06k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
40.52k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
6.73k (x0.71)
TOTAL
281.48k
291.53k (x1.04)

Performance/W
4110
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4