| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.6 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
800f11
Core
Skylake-SP
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.95k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
18.36k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.39k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
17.35k (x2.65)
TOTAL
25.46k
45.06k (x1.77)

Multithread

4110

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
19.47k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
77.19k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
15.4k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
12.25k (x1.26)
TOTAL
156.83k
124.3k (x0.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
14.63k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
24.09k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.51k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.86k (x2.33)
TOTAL
45.82k
60.09k (x1.31)

Multithread

4110

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
48.75k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
80.1k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
24.5k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
19.85k (x2.09)
TOTAL
281.48k
173.2k (x0.62)

Performance/W
4110
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4