| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
810f81
Core
Skylake-SP
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.89k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
17.94k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.34k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
6.62k (x1.01)
TOTAL
25.46k
33.79k (x1.33)

Multithread

4110

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
15.07k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
66.84k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
19.56k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
6.54k (x0.67)
TOTAL
156.83k
108.01k (x0.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
14.48k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.84k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.43k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
5.46k (x0.8)
TOTAL
45.82k
49.21k (x1.07)

Multithread

4110

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
54.39k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
88.77k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
20.04k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
5.48k (x0.58)
TOTAL
281.48k
168.69k (x0.6)

Performance/W
4110
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4