| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806c2
Core
Skylake-SP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.57k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
17.21k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
9.97k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
14.98k (x2.29)
TOTAL
25.46k
46.75k (x1.84)

Multithread

4110

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
12.75k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
45.98k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
27.86k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
20.06k (x2.07)
TOTAL
156.83k
106.66k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
30.89k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
25.57k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
10.64k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.66k (x2.3)
TOTAL
45.82k
82.77k (x1.81)

Multithread

4110

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
96.34k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
95.75k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
32.29k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
15.2k (x1.6)
TOTAL
281.48k
239.58k (x0.85)

Performance/W
4110
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4