| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-11400F


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.8 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0671
Core
Skylake-SP
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
495.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
31.66k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
26.21k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.96k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
18.5k (x2.72)
TOTAL
45.82k
88.34k (x1.93)

Multithread

4110

i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
210.36k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
203.84k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
72.05k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
9.4k (x0.99)
TOTAL
281.48k
495.65k (x1.76)

Performance/W
4110
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
7625 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4