Xeon X5675 vs X5670
Description
Both models X5675 and X5670 are based on Westmere architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
206c2
Core
Westmere-EP
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6 /12
6 /6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
8.35k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
5.58k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
3.32k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3k (x1.01)
TOTAL
21.04k
20.26k (x0.96)
Multithread
X5675
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
49.72k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
35.19k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
21.88k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
8.6k (x1.63)
TOTAL
124.92k
115.4k (x0.92)
Performance/W
X5675
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4