Xeon X5675 vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.7 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.7 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
a0652
Core
Westmere-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6 /12
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
349.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
16.63k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
24.17k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
6.38k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
13.69k (x4.59)
TOTAL
21.04k
60.87k (x2.89)
Multithread
X5675
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
67.07k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
107.95k (x2.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
27.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.07k (x0.96)
TOTAL
124.92k
207.14k (x1.66)
Performance/W
X5675
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1490 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
601 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
4603 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3325 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
4834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2738 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
12174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4