Xeon X5675 vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-10510U gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-10510U gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806ec
Core
Westmere-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
190.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
17.66k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
25.46k (x4.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
6.4k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
14.05k (x4.71)
TOTAL
21.04k
63.57k (x3.02)
Multithread
X5675
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
54.45k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
84.97k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
21.26k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
8.04k (x1.52)
TOTAL
124.92k
168.72k (x1.35)
Performance/W
X5675
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
3630 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
5665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1417 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
536 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
11248 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3604 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5196 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1307 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2867 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4