| | | | | | |

Xeon X5675 vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i5-8500T gets 203.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.6 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
906ea
Core
Westmere-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6 /12
6/6
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
251.82k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
12.93k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
18.61k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
4.76k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
10.05k (x3.37)
TOTAL
21.04k
46.36k (x2.2)

Multithread

X5675

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
71.15k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
102.74k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
26.6k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
2.9k (x0.55)
TOTAL
124.92k
203.39k (x1.63)

Performance/W
X5675
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
2033 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
760 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
83 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
5811 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5675
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5318 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1360 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
13245 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4