Xeon X5675 vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
706e5
Core
Westmere-EP
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
7.07k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
10.55k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.27k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.66k (x1.9)
TOTAL
21.04k
28.56k (x1.36)
Multithread
X5675
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
25.28k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
37.48k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
17.77k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
6.92k (x1.31)
TOTAL
124.92k
87.45k (x0.7)
Performance/W
X5675
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4