| | | | | | |

Xeon X5675 vs Core i3-8100


Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-8100 gets 152.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
906eb
Core
Westmere-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2011
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
200.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
13.51k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
19.38k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.06k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
7.87k (x2.64)
TOTAL
21.04k
45.81k (x2.18)

Multithread

X5675

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
52.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
75.92k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
19.52k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
4.53k (x0.86)
TOTAL
124.92k
152.86k (x1.22)

Performance/W
X5675
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
814 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
300 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
2352 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5675
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3753 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
12725 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4