| | | | | | |

Xeon X5675 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the X5675 is 2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
706a1
Core
Westmere-EP
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2011
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
61.49k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
4.9k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
7.26k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
2.75k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.32k (x1.11)
TOTAL
21.04k
18.22k (x0.87)

Multithread

X5675

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
18.84k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
27.45k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
10.35k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
4.85k (x0.92)
TOTAL
124.92k
61.49k (x0.49)

Performance/W
X5675
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5675
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4