Xeon X5675 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
506e3
Core
Westmere-EP
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2048 kB
Date
February 2011
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
8.56k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
12.25k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
3.17k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.35k (x1.12)
TOTAL
21.04k
27.33k (x1.3)
Multithread
X5675
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
16.42k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
23.61k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
5.75k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
3.55k (x0.67)
TOTAL
124.92k
49.34k (x0.39)
Performance/W
X5675
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4