| | | | | | |

Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
810f10
Core
Westmere-EP
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
198.27k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
13.95k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
20.7k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.33k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.03k (x1.01)
TOTAL
21.04k
43.01k (x2.04)

Multithread

X5675

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
58.56k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
92.95k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
28.55k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
2.98k (x0.56)
TOTAL
124.92k
183.04k (x1.47)

Performance/W
X5675
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5675
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4