| | | | | | |

Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
810f10
Core
Westmere-EP
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
71.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
11.67k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
14.02k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
4.53k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.93k (x0.98)
TOTAL
21.04k
33.14k (x1.58)

Multithread

X5675

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
20.49k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
31.32k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
9.99k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
3.03k (x0.57)
TOTAL
124.92k
64.82k (x0.52)

Performance/W
X5675
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5675
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4