Xeon X5670 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
306a9
Core
Westmere-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2010
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
7.87k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
7.14k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3.04k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
2.79k (x0.93)
TOTAL
20.26k
20.84k (x1.03)
Multithread
X5670
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
15.12k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
14.05k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
5.94k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.48k (x0.4)
TOTAL
115.4k
38.59k (x0.33)
Performance/W
X5670
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4