Xeon X5670 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 2700X gets 428.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.7 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 2700X gets 428.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.7 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
800f82
Core
Westmere-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
6 /6
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2010
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
433.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
15.22k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
24.12k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
5.87k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
21k (x7)
TOTAL
20.26k
66.21k (x3.27)
Multithread
X5670
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
126.81k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
229.86k (x6.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
61.74k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
9.77k (x1.14)
TOTAL
115.4k
428.19k (x3.71)
Performance/W
X5670
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
2189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
588 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
4078 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3540 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
4884 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
15397 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4