Xeon X5670 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
810f81
Core
Westmere-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2010
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
140.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
11.98k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
15.85k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.53k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
3.29k (x1.1)
TOTAL
20.26k
35.65k (x1.76)
Multithread
X5670
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
48.28k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
74.19k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
23.29k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.47k (x0.4)
TOTAL
115.4k
149.23k (x1.29)
Performance/W
X5670
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
9949 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4