Xeon X5670 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
100fa0
Core
Westmere-EP
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
6 /6
6/6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
5.17k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
5.33k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
2.76k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
3.51k (x1.17)
TOTAL
20.26k
16.77k (x0.83)
Multithread
X5670
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
29.82k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
30.79k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
15.88k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.69k (x0.43)
TOTAL
115.4k
80.19k (x0.69)
Performance/W
X5670
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4