Xeon X3430 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
50657
Core
Lynnfield
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2009
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
1.97k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
8.15k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
2.37k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
4.84k (x1.82)
TOTAL
10.65k
17.32k (x1.63)
Multithread
X3430
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
15.73k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
64.78k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
18.06k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
5.21k (x1.18)
TOTAL
35.49k
103.77k (x2.92)
Performance/W
X3430
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4