| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core 2 Duo E6600


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the E6600 gets 16.5 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 3.4 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
6f6
Core
Lynnfield
Conroe
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
July 2006

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
2383 (36.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
2386 (-39.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
2391 (4.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
2785 (4.90%)
TOTAL
10647
9945 (-6.59%)

Multithread

X3430

E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
4685 (-31.17%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
4682 (-69.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
4691 (-47.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
1803 (-59.21%)
TOTAL
35493
15861 (-55.31%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
2756 (-56.98%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
2474 (-42.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
2476 (3.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
2518 (-5.78%)
TOTAL
15738
10224 (-35.04%)

Multithread

X3430

E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
5324 (-78.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
4668 (-72.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
4742 (-49.15%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
1769 (-59.54%)
TOTAL
55657
16503 (-70.35%)

Performance/W
X3430
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
82 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
72 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
73 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
254 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
1031 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
4260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8