Xeon X3430 vs Core i3-550
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-550 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i3-550 gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i3-550 gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
20655
Core
Lynnfield
Clarkdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
73 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
18.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
38.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
i3-550
Test#1 (Integers)
6.41k
7.83k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
4.27k
5.3k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
3.14k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.43k (x0.91)
TOTAL
15.74k
18.69k (x1.19)
Multithread
X3430
i3-550
Test#1 (Integers)
25.19k
16.25k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
12.12k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.33k
8.01k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
2.42k (x0.55)
TOTAL
55.66k
38.8k (x0.7)
Performance/W
X3430
i3-550
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
531 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
i3-550
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
2446 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
1655 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
759 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
5842 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4