| | | | | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.5 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
806ec
Core
Lynnfield
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
4.26k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
15.48k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
4.94k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
4.31k (x1.62)
TOTAL
10.65k
28.98k (x2.72)

Multithread

X3430

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
7.41k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
29.18k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
10.26k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
3.27k (x0.74)
TOTAL
35.49k
50.13k (x1.41)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.41k
14.3k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
4.27k
20.09k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
5.23k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
4.24k (x1.59)
TOTAL
15.74k
43.87k (x2.79)

Multithread

X3430

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.19k
25.51k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
41.33k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.33k
10.81k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
3.21k (x0.73)
TOTAL
55.66k
80.85k (x1.45)

Performance/W
X3430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
5390 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4