| | | | | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-1135G7


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 141.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 2.5 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
806c1
Core
Lynnfield
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2009
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
262.07k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
3.77k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
17.26k (x4.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
9.24k (x4.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
8.39k (x3.16)
TOTAL
10.65k
38.66k (x3.63)

Multithread

X3430

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
16.86k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
76.62k (x4.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
34.56k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
4.5k (x1.02)
TOTAL
35.49k
132.53k (x3.73)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6.41k
13.43k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
4.27k
22.29k (x5.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
11.18k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
9.75k (x3.65)
TOTAL
15.74k
56.64k (x3.6)

Multithread

X3430

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.19k
40.24k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
65.99k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.33k
28.51k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
6.66k (x1.52)
TOTAL
55.66k
141.4k (x2.54)

Performance/W
X3430
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
2357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
1018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
5050 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
2661 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
2321 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
13486 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4