Xeon W3550 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Bloomfield
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2009
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
10.08k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
10.11k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
4.06k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
2.36k (x0.77)
TOTAL
20.24k
26.6k (x1.31)
Multithread
W3550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
36.86k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
38.51k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
15.17k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
2.72k (x0.43)
TOTAL
73.21k
93.26k (x1.27)
Performance/W
W3550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4