| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a1
Core
Bloomfield
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
1.68k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
5.29k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
2.75k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.44k (x1.11)
TOTAL
13.92k
13.16k (x0.95)

Multithread

W3550

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
6.39k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
20.02k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
10.22k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
4.94k (x0.8)
TOTAL
47.09k
41.57k (x0.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
4.9k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
7.26k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.75k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
3.32k (x1.08)
TOTAL
20.24k
18.22k (x0.9)

Multithread

W3550

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
18.84k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
27.45k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
10.35k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
4.85k (x0.77)
TOTAL
73.21k
61.49k (x0.84)

Performance/W
W3550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4