| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Celeron 3855U


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 3 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
406e3
Core
Bloomfield
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2096 kB
Date
August 2009
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
24.56k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
1.64k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
6.72k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
2.06k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
13.92k
12.83k (x0.92)

Multithread

W3550

3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
2.2k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
9.59k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
2.76k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
2.27k (x0.37)
TOTAL
47.09k
16.81k (x0.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
5.93k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
8.53k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.28k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
2.5k (x0.81)
TOTAL
20.24k
19.24k (x0.95)

Multithread

W3550

3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
7.87k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
11.28k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
2.91k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
2.5k (x0.4)
TOTAL
73.21k
24.56k (x0.34)

Performance/W
W3550
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
1637 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4