Xeon W3550 vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 47.1 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.6 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 47.1 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.6 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
810f81
Core
Bloomfield
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
175.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.78k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
16.42k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
4.75k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
5.51k (x1.78)
TOTAL
13.92k
30.46k (x2.19)
Multithread
W3550
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
15.18k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
74.87k (x3.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
27.85k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
6.08k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.09k
123.97k (x2.63)
Performance/W
W3550
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
67 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
152 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
362 points/W
3542 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3550
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
690 points/GHz
945 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1564 points/GHz
4105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
928 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
TOTAL
4175 points/GHz
7615 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4