| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.5 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
810f10
Core
Bloomfield
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2009
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.8k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
17.38k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
5.17k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.16k (x1.02)
TOTAL
13.92k
29.52k (x2.12)

Multithread

W3550

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
15.28k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
76.44k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
27.48k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
3.02k (x0.49)
TOTAL
47.09k
122.2k (x2.59)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
13.95k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
20.7k (x3.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
5.33k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
3.03k (x0.98)
TOTAL
20.24k
43.01k (x2.12)

Multithread

W3550

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
58.56k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
92.95k (x4.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
28.55k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
2.98k (x0.47)
TOTAL
73.21k
183.04k (x2.5)

Performance/W
W3550
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4