| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806c1
Core
Bloomfield
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2009
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.75k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
17.22k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
9.79k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
8.21k (x2.66)
TOTAL
13.92k
38.97k (x2.8)

Multithread

W3550

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
9.19k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
35.47k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
19.14k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
5.82k (x0.94)
TOTAL
47.09k
69.62k (x1.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
12.9k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
21.4k (x3.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
10.73k (x3.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
8.16k (x2.65)
TOTAL
20.24k
53.19k (x2.63)

Multithread

W3550

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
30.31k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
45.13k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
20.17k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.77k (x0.92)
TOTAL
73.21k
101.38k (x1.38)

Performance/W
W3550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4